Skip to content

A clearer view of
3D scanning.

Specs. Sources. Perspective.

Search ScanVersus

Einscan Pro vs Artec Eva: Professional Scanner Comparison

EinScan Pro 2X undercuts Artec Eva’s reseller-quoted price by roughly two-thirds while publishing a tighter single-scan accuracy figure; Eva answers with far higher raw capture speed.

Conceptual CGI illustration: a generic tripod-mounted 3D scanner projects light lines onto a metal gear on a turntable, rendered half as a teal mesh, while a generic handheld scanner captures a plaster bust that dissolves into a point cloud
Conceptual illustration (AI-generated CGI, not a product photo or an independent test): generic, unbranded scanners symbolizing the EinScan Pro 2X vs Artec Eva trade-off of a fixed turntable setup for detailed parts versus fast handheld capture of larger objects. Any lettering on the devices is a rendering artifact, not a brand. Produced October 17, 2026.

Buyers choosing between the EinScan Pro 2X and the Artec Eva are really choosing between two different budgets and two different jobs. The Pro 2X lists around $5,999, while the Eva runs closer to $19,800 through resellers as of September 2026 — a gap of over $13,000 that should drive the decision as much as any single spec.

At a Glance

  • Category: Professional handheld 3D scanners for reverse engineering, product design and full-color capture
  • EinScan Pro 2X: $5,999, 0.04mm single-scan accuracy, white LED light, four scan modes
  • Artec Eva: ~$19,800 (reseller-quoted), 18,000,000 points/sec, structured-light, markerless capture
  • Deciding spec: Accuracy-per-dollar (Pro 2X) versus capture speed and full-color throughput (Eva)

Full Spec Comparison

Axis EinScan Pro 2X Artec Eva
Accuracy Up to 0.04mm (single-scan), per manufacturer specs Up to 0.1mm, per manufacturer specs
Resolution Varies by scan mode; HD mode prioritizes detail over speed Up to 0.5mm 3D resolution; 1.3MP texture resolution for full-color capture
Capture Speed Up to 1,500,000 points/sec (30fps) in Handheld Rapid Scan mode Up to 18,000,000 points/sec at up to 16fps
Working Volume/Range Scan area from 150x120mm to 250x200mm depending on mode Not specified in cited source beyond general handheld range
Tracking Optional marker-based tracking (ships with markers and marker remover) plus feature tracking in handheld modes Markerless structured-light capture, including on black and shiny surfaces without spray, per the manufacturer
Weight 2.5lbs / 1.13kg 0.9kg / 2lb
Computer Requirements Capable Windows PC to run Shining3D’s EXScan software Capable Windows PC to run Artec Studio
Software & Subscriptions Bundled EXScan processing software; no subscription pricing specified here Artec Studio, Artec’s proprietary processing software; no subscription pricing specified here
Price $5,999 as of September 2026, per Top3DShop ~$19,800 as of September 2026, per Aniwaa; this is a reseller-quoted figure, not a fixed Artec list price, since Artec sells on a quote basis

Where EinScan Pro 2X Wins

The Pro 2X publishes a tighter single-scan accuracy figure — 0.04mm versus the Eva’s 0.1mm, per each manufacturer’s specs — while costing roughly a third of the Eva’s reseller-quoted price. That combination makes it a strong pick for buyers who need fine detail on small-to-medium parts without an industrial budget.

It also ships as a complete kit: markers, a marker remover, a turntable and a tripod are included, so a shop can go from unboxing to fixed-scan setups for small objects on day one. Four selectable scan modes (handheld rapid, handheld HD, and two fixed configurations) give it flexibility across object sizes that a single-mode scanner cannot match.

Where Artec Eva Wins

The Eva’s headline number is throughput: up to 18,000,000 points per second at 16fps, versus the Pro 2X’s 1,500,000 points per second at 30fps in rapid mode. For larger objects or full-body scans, that gap translates into far fewer passes to cover the same surface, per Artec’s published specs.

At 0.9kg, the Eva is also noticeably lighter than the Pro 2X’s 1.13kg, which matters over long handheld sessions. Its structured-light system captures full-color texture data at 1.3 megapixels and, per the manufacturer, handles black and shiny surfaces without needing an anti-glare spray — a common pain point for competing scanners.

Verdict: Which Should You Buy?

Engineers and small studios scanning small-to-mid-size parts on a tight budget get more accuracy per dollar from the EinScan Pro 2X. Buyers who need faster full-color capture of larger objects, lighter handheld ergonomics, and an established professional pedigree should budget for the Artec Eva instead. For more on how we build these comparisons, see our editorial policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Artec Eva worth roughly three times the price of the EinScan Pro 2X?

It depends on the workload. The Eva’s reseller-quoted ~$19,800 (Aniwaa, as of September 2026) buys higher capture speed (18M points/sec vs 1.5M) and markerless full-color scanning, which suits production pipelines where scan time is billed by the hour. For accuracy-focused work on smaller parts, the Pro 2X’s 0.04mm rating at $5,999 (Top3DShop, as of September 2026) can deliver comparable or better precision for far less.

Does either scanner need a special computer?

Both require a capable Windows PC to run their respective software — Shining3D’s EXScan software for the Pro 2X and Artec Studio for the Eva. Neither manufacturer’s cited specs list a minimum configuration beyond that here.

Why doesn’t Artec list a fixed price for the Eva?

Artec sells through a quote-based model rather than publishing direct list pricing, so figures like the ~$19,800 cited here come from resellers such as Aniwaa and can shift with regional promotions. Buyers should confirm current pricing directly with an authorized Artec reseller before purchasing.